If the paranoid myopia that drives such thinking penetrates too deeply into the law, search engines will eventually shut down. What’s the difference, after all, between a copyrighted Web page and a copyrighted book? What if Internet entrepreneurs could sue Google for indexing their websites? What if the law required search engines to get clearance for every Web page? Even a company as large and well-funded as Google couldn’t pull that off because what’s on the Internet, and who owns that content, changes constantly.
As one author told me, “fear of obscurity, not digital indexing, is what keeps most authors awake at night.”
Technology that makes it easier to find, buy and read books is good for everyone — even the authors suing Google.
Mr. Semel describes a strategy built on four pillars: First, is search, of course, to fend off Google, which has become the fastest-growing Internet company. Next comes community, as he calls the vast growth of content contributed by everyday users and semiprofessionals like bloggers. Third, is the professionally created content that Mr. Braun oversees, made both by Yahoo and other traditional media providers. And last, is personalization technology to help users sort through vast choices to find what interests them.
[…] Increasingly, Mr. Semel and others are finding that the long-promised convergence of television and computers is happening not by way of elaborate systems created by cable companies, but from the bottom up as video clips on the Internet become easier to use and more interesting. Already, video search engines, run by Yahoo and others, have indexed more than one million clips, and only now are the big media outlets like Viacom and Time Warner moving to put some of their quality video online.
[…] One of Yahoo’s secret weapons, Mr. Braun says, is that it can personalize information for the interests of each user, such as its My Yahoo page and the song recommendations provided to users of its music service. Mr. Braun is weaving this technology into a video player Yahoo will introduce near the end of the year.
“It will almost be like a television set,” Mr. Braun said, except as people watch one program, on the center of the player, other areas will offer additional programming choices, based on their past viewing habits. It will let them use Yahoo’s video search to find programs from amateur videographers and video bloggers. And it will, of course, promote the glitzy shows Mr. Braun is creating.
“People want the freedom to do exactly what they want to do,” he said. “But they also like to be programmed to and reminded of the different things that exist. Yahoo is in a position to do both of those.”
The licensing agreements between Apple, maker of the wildly popular iPod digital music player and operator of the most widely used music download service, and the record labels are set to expire next spring.
Both sides, which have benefited enormously from music sales created by the iPod phenomenon, are jockeying for position.
[…] Record executives, however, are seeking some flexibility in prices, including the ability to charge more for some songs and less for others, the way they do in the traditional retail world.
“There’s no content in the world that has doesn’t have some price flexibility,” said Warner Music Group Corp. (NYSE:WMG – news) chief executive Edgar Bronfman at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia investor conference here. “Not all songs are created equal. Not all albums are created equal.
“That’s not to say we want to raise prices across the board or that we don’t believe in a 99-cent price point for most music,” he said. “But there are some songs for which consumers would be willing to pay more. And some we’d be willing to sell for less.”
Don’t miss the discussion, where he is chastised for resisting buying a $500 Mac mini: ï¿½ DRM nightmare: Why $20,000 worth of gear won’t play my 99 cent songs
It’s kind of screwed up if you think about it. In search of that zen feel where I can have the benefits of modern day audio/video in any room in my house, but without all sorts of unsightly equipment, wires, and splitters spilling out from the nooks and crannies of those rooms, I’ve already sunk nearly $20,000 into a state-of-the-art whole-home system and I’m not even done yet. Microsoft’s Bill Gates may have the ultimate digital crib in the suburbs of Seattle. But, by the time I’m done, I won’t be far behind.
[…] The mainbar to this story is that the one of my most important goals for this project — to have a shared, centralized (and largely out of sight) system that handles the delivery of audio and/or video to any room in my house — is being undermined by Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology.
[…] How ridiculous is it that today, I can buy a song for 99 cents that I can’t just go and play on my $20,000 system? Instead, to use the music I purchase (not just at the iTunes music store, but, pretty much any online music store), I have to use a PC to jump through a ridiculous amount of hoops to remove the DRM wrapper in a process that can often result in a loss of quality.
Popular file-sharing site WinMX.com ceased operating and the New York office of another, eDonkey.com, appeared to be closed, in the continuing legal fallout among underworld peer-to-peer music services, industry sources and users said on Wednesday.
[…] The latest developments come on the heels of a pending deal in which file-sharing service Grokster Ltd. is set to be acquired by Mashboxx LLC, a new company formed with the intent of establishing a legal peer-to-peer music company, sources familiar with the matter said.
[…] The current generation of file-sharing networks are all descendants of the original music-sharing phenomenon Napster, which was forced to shut down, and now operates as a legal music service.
However, peer-to-peer technology has lived on in programs like WinMX, which represent a sort of transitional generation of media-sharing programs between the pioneering Napster and more modern programs like Gnutella and eDonkey.
Despite the legal wrangling, free file-sharing has persisted and many in the industry believe it is about to embark on a new era in which it will finally be embraced commercially by media companies for legitimate purposes.
A new line of Chinese condoms is attracting headlines, legal scrutiny and more than its share of bad jokes. The products’ names: “Clinton” and “Lewinsky.”
[…] “We chose the name because we think Clinton is a symbol of success and a man of responsibility. And Lewinsky is a woman who dares to love and dares to hate,” said Liu Wenhua, the company’s general manager.
[…] Liu added that because the names were registered properly with the central government’s trademark office, he didn’t anticipate any legal problems. The registration process normally takes a few months and costs about $35.
But Zheng Zhangjun, a trademark attorney with the Fengshi law firm in Beijing, said given Clinton’s fame and the evident intent to use his name for commercial gain, the former president appeared to have a strong legal case against the company.
Two articles on Verizon’s moves into video over a fiber-optic net:
Verizon Communications Inc., the largest U.S. telephone company, will begin offering television service today in a Texas town, a step that may eventually pressure cable companies to lower prices.
Verizon’s launch of commercial TV service over fiber-optic lines in Keller, Tex., begins competition between cable companies and regional telephone giants to offer customers video, voice and high-speed Internet services.
The companies also said they plan to work together to address Internet piracy. Verizon will forward notices to subscribers allegedly pirating Disney’s works.
Verizon will cancel Internet service for subscribers who have infringed Disney copyrights and received multiple notices, or identify them in response to subpoenas.
Should make for an interesting court case, if true.
Seeking to break a four-year impasse, the European Commission offered a compromise on anti-terrorist legislation yesterday that would require telephone network operators and Internet service providers to keep records of phone calls and Internet traffic for a shorter amount of time.
[…] Privacy advocates and telecommunications operators reacted warily to Mr. Frattini’s plan. Gus Hosein, a lecturer in technology policy at the London School of Economics and a member of Privacy International, a group based in London that opposes data retention, said the law’s chance of approval was “slim at best.”
Europe’s national privacy laws, he noted, are far more restrictive than those in the United States, where Internet data retention is not required, though phone companies are required by law to keep call log records for six years.
Michael Bartholomew, director general of the European Telecom Network Operators Association, an industry group, said in Brussels that network operators already routinely cooperated with law enforcement officials, providing them case-by-case with information that operators collect in the normal course of business.
Carlos M. Gutierrez, the commerce secretary, announced on Wednesday a series of initiatives aimed at curbing the global trade in pirated and counterfeit goods, a problem that American businesses say is costing them $250 billion a year.
As part of the plan, the Commerce Department will send intellectual property experts abroad to monitor cases in the countries where much of the counterfeiting and piracy appears to be centered, including Brazil, China, India and Russia.
The department will also start an educational program offering two-day seminars for American small businesses on how to protect their intellectual property rights. The agency has also established a training program for foreign officials.
Some of the chatter has been dismissive and critical of Skype and its “peer-to-peer” technology. But the Skype deal and smaller acquisitions by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. also are sparking optimism that the industry is now pushing into the consumer and corporate mainstream after a decade of promises.
“Skype has done the community at large a favor,” said Mark Spencer, a mini-rock star in that community who created a free “open source” platform for office phone systems based on Internet Protocol technology. […]
[…] One Asterisk programmer at the show used the platform to create a service to connect people displaced by Hurricane Katrina with friends and family. The service, called Contact Loved Ones, lets evacuees punch in a home number where they’re no longer located and record a message. Acquaintances who dial in and enter the number will be played that message and can leave their own.
Yaacov Menken, one of several Princeton University alumni who collaborated on the service, said doing that with a traditional phone system would have cost tens of thousands of dollars.