Another example of the merits of Charlie Nesson’s view on how to some of these problems will get resolved: Which Videos Are Protected? Lawmakers Get a Lesson – New York Times
As the new Congress experiments with the wide world of blogging and video clips, members are learning the complexities of copyright law, much the way the casual YouTube user has learned that there are corporations out there that own â€œLostâ€ and can stop you from posting a favorite episode.
The introduction began awkwardly this month when the House Republican Study Committee issued a news release accusing Speaker Nancy Pelosi of â€œpiratingâ€ 16 copyrighted clips of House floor debate from the public affairs network C-Span by including them on her new blog, The Gavel.
[…] The speakerâ€™s spokesman, Brendan Daly, used the opportunity to decry â€œyet another baseless attack of the Republicans; in this case they have retracted it.â€
But last week, as it happens, C-Span did contact the speakerâ€™s office to have it take down a different clip from her blog â€” one shot by C-Spanâ€™s cameras at a House Science and Technology Committee hearing on global warming where Ms. Pelosi testified, Mr. Daly said. (The blog has substituted material filmed by the committeeâ€™s cameras, he said.)
C-Span, a private nonprofit company financed by the cable and satellite affiliates that carry its programming, says that over more than 25 years of operating it has consistently asserted its copyright to any material it shoots with its own cameras. But that message can get lost.