I like John Holdren (although I don’t really know him all that well), and I believe he’ll be a good science advisor, but I think that the issues that Tierney raises in this blog posting (Flawed Science Advice for Obama?) are ones that anyone involved in science & technology policy should always be mindful of — it’s why I assign Pielke‘s papers in ESD.10.
Dr. Holdren is certainly entitled to his views, but what concerns me is his tendency to conflate the science of climate change with prescriptions to cut greenhouse emissions. Even if most climate scientists agree on the anthropogenic causes of global warming, that doesn’t imply that the best way to deal with the problem is through drastic cuts in greenhouse emissions. There are other ways to cope, and there’s no “scientific consensus” on which path looks best.
You can find quite a few of Pielke, Jr.’s papers here
Music industry drops bid to sue song swappers (pdf)
The group representing the US recording industry said yesterday it has abandoned its policy of suing people for sharing songs protected by copyright and will work with Internet service providers to cut abusers access if they ignore repeated warnings.
The move ends a controversial program that saw the Recording Industry Association of America sue about 35,000 people since 2003 for swapping songs online. Because of high legal costs for defenders, virtually all of those hit with lawsuits settled, on average for around $3,500. The association’s legal costs, in the meantime, exceeded the settlement money brought in.
The association said yesterday it stopped sending out lawsuits and warnings in August, and then agreed with several leading US Internet service providers, without naming them, to notify alleged illegal file-sharers and cut off service if they failed to stop.
Based on this report in the Wall Street Journal: Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits (pdf)