Abuse? None Here! At Least, Not Intentional!

Frequent Errors In FBI’s Secret Records Requestspdf

According to three officials with access to the report, Fine said the possible violations he discovered did not “manifest deliberate attempts to circumvent statutory limitations or departmental policies.”

But Fine found that FBI agents used national security letters without citing an authorized investigation, claimed “exigent” circumstances that did not exist in demanding information and did not have adequate documentation to justify the issuance of letters.

In at least two cases, the officials said, Fine found that the FBI obtained full credit reports using a national security letter that could lawfully be employed to obtain only summary information. In an unknown number of other cases, third parties such as telephone companies, banks and Internet providers responded to national security letters with detailed personal information about customers that the letters do not permit to be released. The FBI “sequestered” that information, a law enforcement official said last night, but did not destroy it.

NYTimes: U.S. Report to Fault F.B.I. on Subpoenas; Lawmakers Vow Hearings on FBI Errorspdf

The unclassified report from the Office of the Inspector General: A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of National Security Letters (local copy)

From page xxxiv of the Executive Summary:

We identified two ways in which FBI Headquarters Counterterrorism Division circumvented the requirements of national security letter authorities or issued NSLs contrary to the Attorney General’s NSI Guidelines and internal FBI policy. First, we learned that on over 700 occasions the FBI obtained telephone toll billing records or subscriber information from 3 telephone companies without first issuing NSLs or grand jury subpoenas. [….]

Glenn Greenwald points to the role of Presidential signing statements in this mess. (also this)

Taking Their Complaints To The Hill

Music Industry Tightens Squeeze On Studentspdf

Yesterday, the recording industry trade group took its complaints about illegal music downloading to the Hill, saying progress at U.S. campuses has been too slow.

“Music has never been more popular with fans than it is right now,” said Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America, in a hearing before the House Judiciary subcommittee on courts, the Internet and intellectual property. Yet fewer people, particularly college students, are paying for it, he said.

I like this claim:

John Vaughn, executive vice president of the Association of American Universities, told the subcommittee that software-filtering tools designed to shut down music file-trading can be problematic. Some colleges use file-trading programs similar to those used for music for legitimate research purposes.

Sherman, of the RIAA, disputed that point. “Nobody’s using [file-trading services] for Shakespeare’s sonnets,” he said.