Net needs law enforcement, author says [via a blog doesn’t need a clever name]
“Bagel and Mydoom are the future of virus-writing because they have a business model,” he said. “Those are organized crime activities. … These are crooks.” […]
[…] “This is the birth of a genuine, no-kidding, for-profit … multinational criminal underworld,” he said. “I don’t see any way it can’t happen. We’re going to end up getting pushed around by bands of international electronic thieves in a very similar way to the way we’ve been pushed around by gangs of international Mafia and international Mujahideen terrorists.”
[…] With cyberthreats likely to rise, the U.S. government needs to focus on enforcement of existing laws, including antifraud laws, Sterling said. He praised New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who prosecuted Buffalo spammer Howard Carmack earlier this year, as well as other white collar criminals. Although virus writers and many spammers break existing laws, most prosecutors seem reluctant to take on computer cases, Sterling said
“In my opinion, we need a thousand guys like (Spitzer),” Sterling said.”We’ve got a ridiculous amount of computer laws.”
Is it possible that our Attorney General has misdirected our federal law enforcement resources in the face of a clear and present threat? Naaaaahhhhh, nobody would make the same mistake twice, would they?
See, for example, Gartner: Phishing on the rise in U.S.
Scott Rosenberg’s weblog entry on the Airport Express includes this gem from Steven Jobs
About the gulf between Hollywood and Silicon Valley: “Technology people don’t understand the process these creative companies go through to build the things they produce. And the creative people don’t appreciate how creative technology is.”
“The biggest threat to Hollywood is not the Internet but the DVD burners.”
Video game makers sue over copying program
Atari, Electronic Arts and Vivendi Universal Games filed suit against the software company in New York federal court, asking a judge to block distribution of 321 Studios’ Games X Copy software.
“Federal law makes it clear that it is illegal to manufacture, distribute, or sell devices or programs that circumvent technological protection measures built into video games,” Douglas Lowenstein, president of the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), said in a statement. “That’s exactly what 321 Studios’ Games X Copy does, and we fully expect the court to grant our request to ban this product.”
Hollywood steps up antipiracy campaign
Hollywood studios on Tuesday said they plan to “significantly” increase monitoring of online film trading, as part of a broader antipiracy campaign aimed at quashing Net movie piracy.
Following the lead of the big record labels’ trade association, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) said it will also step up antipiracy education efforts, including working closely with colleges to create student “codes of conduct” and taking out newspaper and magazine advertisements.
From Copyfight: DirecTV Drops “Guilt-by-Purchase” Strategy. From the EFF press release:
After discussions with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Center for Internet and Society (CIS) Cyberlaw Clinic, satellite television giant DirecTV has agreed to modify its nationwide campaign against signal piracy in order to reduce threats and lawsuits against innocent users of smart card technology. Chief among these changes is a promise to no longer sue or threaten to sue people merely for possessing smart card devices.
Slashdot: DirecTV Extortion Program stopped by EFF
Update (8:35 PM): Court rules DirecTV can’t sue for gear possession
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals said Tuesday that DirecTV can’t sue individuals, such as defendant Mike Treworgy, for owning equipment enabling them to intercept television programming. The court was supporting a ruling by the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida, Ft. Myers Division that said DirecTV could not sue individuals for owning gear.
“A decision like this says that you must prove that someone did something wrong–just owning a product doesn’t mean you did something wrong,” said Jason Schultz, an attorney with the Electronics Frontier Foundation. The civil liberties organization filed an amicus brief in support of Treworgy who is represented by his attorney Albert Zakarian.
EFF Deep Links: DirecTV Drops “Guilt-by-Purchase” Strategy and DirecTV Double Play
Later: Scope of DirectTV’s problems – DirecTV hacker sentenced to seven years
Women Vote for Paper Trail
The League of Women Voters rescinded its support of paperless voting machines on Monday after hundreds of angry members voiced concern that paper ballots were the only way to safeguard elections from fraud, hackers or computer malfunctions.
About 800 delegates who attended the nonpartisan league’s biennial convention in Washington voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution that supports “voting systems and procedures that are secure, accurate, recountable and accessible.”
That relatively neutral stance was a sharp change from last year, when league leaders endorsed paperless terminals as reliable alternatives to antiquated punch-card and lever systems. About 30 percent of the electorate will use touch-screen voting machines in the November election, and hardly any of the machines provide paper records that could be used in case of a contested election.
Last year’s endorsement infuriated members from chapters around the country — particularly in Silicon Valley and other technology-savvy enclaves, where computer scientists say the systems jeopardize elections. Legitimate recounts are impossible without paper records of every vote cast, they say.
After last week, I’m glad it’s been said as well as it is here: Travesty of Justice
No question: John Ashcroft is the worst attorney general in history.
[…] First, there’s the absence of any major successful prosecutions. The one set of convictions that seemed fairly significant — that of the “Detroit 3” — appears to be collapsing over accusations of prosecutorial misconduct. (The lead prosecutor has filed a whistle-blower suit against Mr. Ashcroft, accusing him of botching the case. The Justice Department, in turn, has opened investigations against the prosecutor. Payback? I report; you decide.)
Then there is the lack of any major captures. Somewhere, the anthrax terrorist is laughing. But the Justice Department, you’ll be happy to know, is trying to determine whether it can file bioterrorism charges against a Buffalo art professor whose work includes harmless bacteria in petri dishes.
Perhaps most telling is the way Mr. Ashcroft responds to criticism of his performance. His first move is always to withhold the evidence. Then he tries to change the subject by making a dramatic announcement of a terrorist threat.
The Bybee memo is here; Michael Froomkin’s analysis; see also this Paperwight’s Fair Shot entry. Slate on Gonzales: Lone Star Justice Also see Terror inquiry snares art exhibit
Apparently so, according to this article: I Sing the Body’s Pattern Recognition Machine
The brain is a five-star generalizer.
It simplifies and organizes, reducing a deluge of sensory information to a manageable sum. From that small sample, the brain produces an effigy of the world, whose features it monitors. Anything that doesn’t fit, or signals trouble, draws a response. As it learns, it compares new phenomena and experiences with old ones.
[…] The brain is a pattern-mad supposing machine. Given just a little stimuli, it divines the probable. When information abounds, it recognizes familiar patterns and acts with conviction. If there’s not much for the senses to report, the brain imagines the rest.
That does mean gambling, sometimes with ruinous consequences. But if we didn’t let imagination fill in the blanks, we’d be unable to survive all the novel predicaments and landscapes we encounter. Imagination is a wild card we use in many ways, sometimes just for fun, but one that probably evolved to help us anticipate trouble. Limited to our senses, we’d be confined to daytime and familiar environments. As much of a confection as our mental maps are, they allow us to speculate, rehearse and make plans.