October 31, 2003

Missed This Salon Article - File Formats and Music [11:55 am]

Musical snares (Letters in response)

This is not the place to engage in a detailed discussion of the relative merits of the different formats. Suffice it to say that about a year ago I committed an egregious error. When I finally purchased my first computer with a CD burner, I was so excited about being able to make my own CD mixes that I unthinkingly went ahead and used the Windows Media Player to rip all my favorite CDs to my hard drive. The Windows Media Player allows users to encode their songs only in the WMA format, which (like iTunes’ AAC format) comes with various digital rights management capabilities built in.

Now I have all this music that iTunes won’t play, and a bunch of songs purchased from iTunes that the Media Player won’t play. So, at the moment, I am prevented from burning a CD that has songs from both libraries. There are converters available that will transform WMA files into AACs and eventually there will no doubt be converters that perform the reverse service, but the process is a hassle that may end up downgrading the overall sound quality. I would have been far better off if I had ripped all my CDs to MP3s to begin with, because iTunes and the iPod will play MP3s. (And even, better, the iTunes software will allow me to rip my CDs into MP3s.)

I should have known better, because now I’m sitting exactly where Microsoft wants me, facing a significant “switching cost” if I want to adopt iTunes as my music-management software of choice. It takes time to rip CDs — and I have a lot of ‘em.

[...] I am confident that the marketplace is going to steadily deliver a progression of options that benefit me in some way: a wider selection of songs, lower prices, easier-to-use software. But I’m not confident that I won’t be endlessly posed with a series of ever more onerous switching costs. Perhaps, once hard drives and bandwidth get big enough, we’ll be able to do away with compression formats altogether, but companies like Microsoft and Apple are still going to strive to lock users in to their software/hardware platforms as long as they can. And that is decidedly not an example of the marketplace serving my consumer desires.

permalink to just this entry

An Apt Topic - Ernest Miller on Nosferatu [9:09 am]

Happy Halloween, Nosferatu (No Thanks to Copyright)

permalink to just this entry

A Look At RIAA Cynicism [9:07 am]

See Ernest Miller’s take on the RIAA’s announced preference for music rating information: RIAA Now a Proponent of Rating and Filtering

permalink to just this entry

Here We Go Again [9:02 am]

Donna sent me the heads-up — CNet News: RIAA files 80 new file-swapping suits

It subsequently sent warning letters to 204 people early in October, saying they had been identified as likely targets of a new round of suits. On Thursday, the group said that 124 of those people decided to try to resolve the issue without going to court.

Note the RIAA is generally celebrating: RIAA Strikes Back At Music Pirates In 2003 — Slashdot commentary: RIAA Calls Settlements Proof that Education is Working

Slashdot includes this transcript of a recent (pending?) South Park episode, spoofing A Christmas Carol and the RIAA’s music downloading posture:

Re:South Park (Score:4, Funny)

by LordKronos (470910) on Friday October 31, @08:47AM (#7357128)


Here is the transcript:


Detective: This is the home of Lars Ulrich, the drummer for Metallica. [they approach a bush] Look. There’s Lars now, sitting by his pool. [he's seen sitting on the edge of a chaise longue, his face in his hands, softly sobbing]

Kyle: What’s the matter with him?

Detective: This month he was hoping to have a gold-plated shark tank bar installed right next to the pool, but thanks to people downloading his music for free, he must now wait a few months before he can afford it. [a close-up of Lars sobbing] Come. There’s more. [leads them away. Next seen is a small airport at night] Here’s Britney Spears’ private jet. Notice anything? [a shot of Britney boarding a plane, then stopping to look at it before entering] Britney used to have a Gulfstream IV. Now she’s had to sell it and get a Gulfstream III because people like you chose to download her music for free. [Britney gives a heavy sigh and goes inside.] The Gulfstream III doesn’t even have a remote control for its surround-sound DVD system. Still think downloading music for free is no big deal?

Kyle: We… didn’t realize what we were doing, eh…

Detective: That is the folly of man. Now look in this window. [they are at another mansion, and they look inside a picture window] Here you see the loving family of Master P. [He's shown tossing a basketball to his wife while his kid tries to catch it] Next week is his son’s birthday and, all he’s ever wanted was an island in French Polynesia. [his mom lowers the ball and gives it to the boy, who smiles, picks it up and drops it. It rolls away and he goes after it]

Kyle: So, he’s gonna get it, right?

Detective: I see an island without an owner. If things keep going the way they are, the child will not get his tropical paradise.

Stan: [apologetically] We’re sorry! We’ll, we’ll never download music for free again!

Detective: [somberly, dramatically] Man must learn to think of these horrible outcomes before he acts selfishly or else… I fear… recording artists will be forever doomed to a life of only semi-luxury.

permalink to just this entry

October 30, 2003

IP Justice on the DMCA Exemptions Ruling [9:19 am]

Consumers Still Unable to Make Lawful Use of Digital Media

permalink to just this entry

Attacking P2P With P2P [9:10 am]

A press release at MI2N leads me to the company Meier Worldwide Intermedia (and their noxious splash screen) and their subsidiary, Covenant Corporation. A ClariNews site article passes along this interesting business plan:

Covenant is developing a service designed to counteract online piracy of video, music and software files. Covenant’s primary service essentially uploads to pirate sites a large number of fictitious files with a video, music or software name, making it more difficult for visitors to the pirate site to download the real video, music or software they are attempting to pirate.

The MI2N press release cited above is a little more explicit:

To preview tracks of artists including New School, individuals can join Covenant at no charge to become members and have the opportunity to win cash and prizes by helping combat piracy in the industry and protect the artists. By downloading Covenant’s patent-pending CMD program at www.protectedbycovenenat.com, members earn the unique opportunity to not only preview music before it is released, but also play a key role in the fight against piracy.

Covenant Corporation, is developing a service designed to counteract online piracy of video, music and software files. Covenant’s primary service essentially uploads to pirate sites a large number of fictitious files with a video, music or software name, making it more difficult for visitors to the pirate site to download the real video, music or software they are attempting to pirate.

Note that the ProtectedByCovenant site is a little less clear about what’s going on. From their what is it/intro page

However you heard of us, here is all you need to know about becoming a member of Team Covenant.

Acting on behalf of the artists you love, Covenant distributes promotional versions of upcoming songs via popular P2P systems such as Kazaa or Gnutella. All you have to do is download our program called the Covenant Media Distributor (CMD). The CMD then automatically downloads new mp3s from our servers to your computer so that others can preview pre-release tracks. This simple process automatically makes you eligible to win a metric buttload of cash. Just leave the CMD running; the longer you leave it on, the more cash you can win!

Why do we do this? Well, the internet allows these bands to get their music heard, and it is waaaaay cheaper to do it this way than to pay a ton of radio stations, stores etc.

The party line defending this approach can be found in this fawning article from ION Magazine:

This may sound like the pitch of a business man trying to overestimate the state-of-the- scene buy [sic] Meier is right on the money. It is the major labels and the artists that the file-sharers are stealing from and thus causing them to lose money. If the labels lose money so do the artists, which mean only the highest selling artists get release priority. In turn, less new acts are developed and released as the labels have fewer resources to promote and market these up-and-coming musical acts. At this point it is not the fault of the labels for not bringing new acts to the forefront but the online consumers who are draining the pockets of the major labels and artists. This is what pissess off consumers the most, hearing the same stuff over and over again, when what they want more than anything is that new hot single from whoever is the artist of the moment. You see that vicious cycle again?

A cute pitch, and a nasty product. I can just imagine the countermeasures that one might see deployed. IANAL, but I wonder just what sort of liability one might be exposed to by joining an organization that pays you to corrupt a digital information distribution network?

(Note that there’s been some material in the wind since March about this.)

permalink to just this entry

FTC on Patent Policy [8:41 am]

Well, here’s something different: FTC Issues Report on How to Promote Innovation Through Balancing Competition with Patent Law and Policy [via Slashdot] The executive summary to the report points out a number of the issues that have been troubling in this area, although some of the recommendations are surprising in their obviousness — I probably need to read the entire report before I can really comment, though.

When I say abviousness, consider this recommendation: "Consider possible harm to competition — along with other possible benefits and costs — before extending the scope of patentable subject matter." I thought that has been the requirement all along?

permalink to just this entry

UserFriendly on iTunes for Windows [8:26 am]

The start of a new story line? October 30th UserFriendly - "Arrrr"

permalink to just this entry

October 29, 2003

To ESD.10: Another View On Animals & Vets [10:00 am]

Off-topic - something for the ESD.10 students as a followup to The Last Meow: When Should You Put Your Dog Down?

permalink to just this entry

Universal vs. Retail [8:46 am]

Music Retailers Slow to Adopt Plan to Lower Price of CD’s [pdf]

A month after Universal Music announced it was cutting CD prices by as much as 30 percent, shoppers looking for the results in the aisles of music stores may be coming away disappointed.

Retailers, many of them angry over details of the plan that may hurt their profit margins, are instituting the price changes slowly and unevenly. A result is a patchwork of prices, ranging from less than $10 to nearly $16, on new Universal CD’s from artists like Ludacris and Edie Brickell. At least one major retailer, Virgin Megastore, has refused to comply with the plan that lowers the wholesale price and eliminates promotional subsidies, selling new Universal CD’s like Ludacris’s “Chicken & Beer” for $15.99. Others, like the HMV chain, have clambered on board, selling “Chicken & Beer” and other Universal titles for the new suggested list price of less than $13. Other deep discounters, including Wal-Mart and Best Buy, have stuck near their customary prices of just under $10.

The result has muted the effect of the price plan, setting the stage for a new battle next month when Universal Music, part of Vivendi Universal, begins an advertising campaign telling consumers to look for the lowered prices at cooperating stores.

permalink to just this entry

The W3C Supports MS in the Eolas Suit [8:43 am]

Hmmm — missed this news yesterday - Web Group Backs Microsoft in Patent Suit [pdf]

A leading Internet standards-setting organization took the unusual step yesterday of urging the director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to invalidate a software patent that the group says threatens the development of the World Wide Web.

[...] The Web group contends that the patent based on work done by Michael Doyle, founder of Eolas Technologies in Chicago, while he was an adjunct professor at the University of California at San Francisco, was improperly granted. In a filing with the patent office, the Web consortium asserts that the ideas in the Eolas patent had previously been published as prior art, a legal term. That prior art was not considered when the patent was granted, or in the Microsoft trial, and thus the patent claims should be invalidated, the consortium contends.

In a long letter yesterday, Tim Berners-Lee, the consortium director, who created the basic software standards for the Web, said the patent office should begin a review of the patent “to prevent substantial economic and technical damage to the operation of the World Wide Web.”

In his letter to James E. Rogan, director of the patent office, Mr. Berners-Lee repeatedly emphasized the wider public interest in a review of the patent. If the claims in the patent are upheld and enforced, Mr. Berners-Lee warned, “the cycle of innovation on the Web would be substantially retarded.” Later, he wrote that the patent, if unchallenged, represented “a substantial setback for global interoperability and the success of the open Web.”

permalink to just this entry

A Look at the Online Music Biz [8:40 am]

Neil Strauss describes just how messy it’s become: Online Music Business, Neither Quick Nor Sure [pdf]

In the last decade a new record business has been forming online. It has been coalescing by trial and error, largely error. And its evolution is in no way complete as it moves toward a finish line at the rate of one step forward for every nine-tenths of a step back.

[...] Clearly, Sonicnet’s music store was more of a me-first venture than a moneymaker, but the message was clear: the Internet was a place for artists to control and directly profit from their music. But in most online services today that dream has been lost, with the services functioning as online arms of the record companies while the artists receive pennies (or fractions of pennies) for each download.

The second dream from the golden age of music downloading was summarized in a catchphrase: All you can eat. The future of the business was in allowing fans access to all the music they wanted for a monthly fee. So far, only the free unauthorized services have accomplished this, chiefly ones that are now defunct, like Napster and Audiogalaxy. The reason the authorized downloading services haven’t accomplished this goal is not because the technology or will is lacking, but because full cooperation from record labels and publishers has not been forthcoming. They fear they would become obsolete.

Thus the authorized services online today are all compromises.

permalink to just this entry

Tennessee’s Super DMCA [8:23 am]

Slashdot discusses yesterday’s hearing on the Tennessee Super-DMCA bill: Tennessee’s Super-DMCA Rises From The Grave. Notes from the hearing: 10/28/2003 Joint Committee Hearing Notes

The next speaker was Todd Flournoy, Counsel and Director of State Legislative Affairs for the MPAA. “On behalf of Jack Valenti, I thank you for this opportunity,” he intoned. He explained that the MPAA’s members were becoming increasingly involved with digital distribution of their content, and that “If we can’t get a handle on Internet piracy, there won’t be a content industry.”

Senator Trail asked Flournoy what specific services were not covered in the current statutes. Flournoy replied that there wasn’t specific coverage of Internet and digital services. Senator Trail answered that it didn’t seem necessary to mention every possible service by name since the current law covers essentially all imaginable forms of electronic communication. At that point, Representative Briley (the bill’s sponsor) said that for that matter, we could just abolish the whole criminal code and replace it with a law that said simply “Do no harm.” Senator Trail responded that he advocated no such thing, only that the solution to a supposedly inadequate law was not necessarily more bad law.

See more at the Tennessee Digital Freedom Forum. The EFF link above has the text of the bill.

permalink to just this entry

Mary & bIPlog Get Slashdot Ink in re Diebold [8:15 am]

Diebold Chases Links To Leaked Memos

See the text of a notice-and-takedown letter

permalink to just this entry

Napster Goes Live Today [8:07 am]

Napster is ready to roll. Now to see what comes of brand name recognition.

permalink to just this entry

Ubersoft Cartoon [7:49 am]

This cartoon remains one of the last vestiges of my OS/2 life (well, one of them, anyway). Today’s strip, a continuing take on the DRM in the new release of Office, should help to illustrate at least one reason that the TCPA and its inheritors/current incarnation is so terribly worrying.

permalink to just this entry

The Latest On The Diebold Mess [7:38 am]

Can be found at The Importance of, where Ernest is covering a multitude of angles on the story

Also, don’t miss the Tom Tomorrow cartoon that Donna referenced.

permalink to just this entry

October 28, 2003

RealNetworks’ Success Story Raises Some Questions [7:24 pm]

CNet News posts a positive article on RealNetwork’s earnings report, which beat the street estimates in RealNetworks’ loss narrows, sales up

However, the Rhapsody statistics (published for the first time) are, to my jaundiced eye, pathetic (but maybe I’m missing something):

Trumpeting its success in digital music services, RealNetworks made public for the first time its subscriber numbers for that division, which includes premium radio and newly acquired Rhapsody. It said that the number of total music subscribers grew by more than 46 percent from the second to third quarter. RealNetworks’ music subscribers, including Rhapsody members, now total 250,000.

Overall, the number of people who pay RealNetworks to stream news, audio and video content to their PCs went up by 15 percent to more than 1.15 million. Most of those gains came through its Rhapsody and RealOne radio subscription services.

permalink to just this entry

Ernest Has ‘Way More Time Than I Do Lately [7:11 pm]

And doing great things with the time he takes — so check out his blog entry pointing to a wide range of discussions on the DMCA exceptions that were posted today by the Librarian of Congress: Ancillary Works on DVD DMCA Exemption Denied

permalink to just this entry

Playlouder MSP [6:16 pm]

There’s the stodgy press release at MI2N (Playlouder & Bulldog Join Forces To Launch The World’s First Royalty Paying ISP), but I like the announcement on the PlayLouder site

As you know only too well, we here are PlayLouder get excited about new things - and so it is with a happy heart that we announce a world first! That’s right, PlayLouder is bringing yours truly the first ever Music Service Provider! Raaaaaaahhhhh!

Which basically means you will now be able to share and download music with your mates and virtual chums all over the UK without worrying about Mr Big beating you with a truncheon, nicking all your cash and throwing your miserable ass in chokey. Because PlayLouder is the first Internet Service Provider to pay Royalties to Record companies.

For a monthly subscription we will bring you a broadband internet connection with high quality music services, whilst paying royalties to rights owners, songwriters, publishers…allowing subscribers to freely exchange licensed music!

What makes PlayLouder MSP so great, is that for the first time - you dear music lovers - can enjoy unlimited access to thousands of legal music files from artists like the White Stripes, the Pixies, Interpol, Underworld, Stereophonics, Soulwax, Mr. Scruff, Elbow, Coldcut, Badly Drawn Boy, Laurent Garnier, Basement Jaxx, Dizzee Rascal, blah blah blah…with royalties being paid to the record companies for activity that previously was unlicensed and unlawful. Neat eh?

permalink to just this entry

October 2003
« Sep   Nov »

0.205 || Powered by WordPress